Real Estate News & Updates from the Monadnock Region
Header

CORONA, Calif., March 12, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ — PartnerFirst is pleased to announce the renewal of its contract with ServiceLink as its nationwide short sale agent network. Through this alliance, now entering its third year, thousands of distressed homeowners can use PartnerFirst agents to resolve their mortgage problems.

PartnerFirst powers the ServiceLink Short Sale Agent Network which connects distressed homeowners with qualified real estate professionals. Through its education platform, including the Pre-foreclosure Specialist Certification (PSC), PartnerFirst educates agents to help distressed homeowners.

Regarding the ongoing alliance with PartnerFirst, Leo Esposito, ServiceLink’s Senior Vice President of Loss Mitigation and Asset Disposition, said, “ServiceLink is pleased with the agent education services and the quality of agents provided by PartnerFirst to power the ServiceLink Short Sale Agent Network. This marks the third year that the two firms will be working together to achieve solutions for the nation’s housing crisis.”

ServiceLink, the national lender platform of Fidelity National Financial, has managed over $10 billion in short sale transactions, working with five of the nation’s top ten lenders. With its experience in working with lenders, investors, mortgage insurers, and junior lien holders, ServiceLink has the flexibility to provide efficient solutions and expeditious closings.

The short sale alternative preserves neighborhood values, minimizes loan loss severities for investors, and provides a dignified resolution for distressed borrowers.

For more information, or to sign up as a ServiceLink short sale agent, visit: http://www.servicelinkfnf.com/downloads/ShortSaleAgentPackage.pdf .

SOURCE PartnerFirst

Ronald Regan made the now famous statement about thirty years ago that the phrase “I’m from the government and I’m here to help”, was a phrase that Americans everywhere have learned to fear. The current mortgage/housing/financial crisis has only reinforced that view for many of us that have had to deal with the destruction of the American dream since this economic debacle began in 2005.

It is clear to me from my day to day dealings with home owners and former homeowners that the government most assuredly is not “here to help”. A big part of my business has become handling cash for keys for banks. Cash for Keys or Relocation Assistance Programs run by lenders to help the occupants of foreclosed properties find a new home and move. The programs are for the most part well run and helpful to the occupants. I do about two or three of these a week. Here’s the way the government “help” becomes tragic: almost everyone of the people I talk to has applied for assistance under the HAMP or HAFA programs offered by the government; almost no one has benefited from these programs; almost all the people I’ve spoken with in the course of doing Relocation Assistance for lenders would have been better off had they never heard of these programs and several have been the victims of outright fraud.

Example: I spoke with a local family last week that has lived in their home for about nine years. They never refinanced, they never took out a home equity line of credit. They have three small children two under the age of five. Over the last nine years they have worked on their home fixed it up as they went along. Early last year the husband lost his job in construction, so he took a job that didn’t pay as well at a fast food place and the wife went to work part time and they burned up some savings but kept their house payments current – they need a place to live, right? They struggled along and they called their mortgage company; their mortgage company told them to apply for the HAMP program. They didn’t understand what it was so they went on the internet and found an attorney that advertised he would help them negotiate the process. They sent their full mortgage payments to him; he was to get the loan modified; after the fourth mortgage payment was taken out of their account sent them an e-mail and said there’s nothing else he can do; house went to foreclosure. Fundamental problem is the creation of false hope by the HAMP program which a reasonable person will see is non-workable so they hire someone who must be “smarter” than them to set it up, unfortunately he was just a crook.

Example: I spoke with a couple in their early sixties; they’ve lived in their home for 31 years; they raised their kids and ran their business from their home all that time. They got behind on their mortgage when their small business started to fail in mid 2007. They struggled to keep things afloat and did. They contacted their mortgage company to see if anything could be done after meeting with local REALTORS about selling their home; they were surprised at first to find that they owed more than their home was now worth and that there was “no way” they could sell their home without having a substantial deficiency due to the bank. They became aware of the HAMP program and decided they would try the program. They were told that they no longer “qualified” for the amount of the mortgage they had and in order to complete the program would have to bring money to pay down the loan amount. Seriously?

By Dick Thackston CRB, ABR, ABRM

Broker NH, MA & VT

By Dick Thackston

2012 is likely to be defined, in the real estate world, by three “E’s”: Expectations, Employment and Europe/Economy. No matter what your political belief system is, no matter how much or how little money you have, these three factors will permeate American life and the economy more than any others in the next eleven and a half months.

Expectations: In the world of sales there is an old truism, “To live with the classes sell to the masses!” those will be the watch words for real estate this year. 2012’s real estate will almost certainly only be about first time buyers and large volumes of REO properties being sold to investors. Both first time buyers and investors have some striking similarities: both groups feel they are buying at the bottom of the market and both groups have an expectation of housing prices increasing over the next three to five years and both groups have an expectation of rents remaining and going higher. (Personally, I agree with both groups.) First time buyers not only have the family formation/nesting instinct driving them into purchasing, but they have the ever increasing cost of renting versus home ownership. Most first time home buyers are renters now and are looking at homes that will have monthly mortgage payments 15-20% below their current rent. Landlords/Investors are looking at the exact same equation from the other side and seeing that almost anything they buy now will have positive cash flow of at least 10% and often up to 20%. The group that is melting away at this time is the investors looking to buy, fix and flip, the risks are too great of carrying a vacant property or over improving and taking a hit in what is in fact a flat market, and of course move-up buyer’s remain effectively locked out of the market for the foreseeable future. Until move up buyers can sell and move there is likely to be no updraft in the real estate market, but when it does begin it will be huge.

Employment: In New Hampshirefor sure, the Northeast in general and for the nation probably, employment getting better.New Hampshire has experienced job creation. Not dramatic but some. GivenNew Hampshire’s favorable tax and business environment it’s not really surprising that it would be one of the first parts of the country to recover. New England more generally seems to be getting better although not at the same rate as New Hampshireand the nation, well let’s face it would be hard to screw things up much more – which is a perverse kind of improvement actually. So as workers become more secure in their outlook on employment, they become more confident that they can cope with a mortgage payment and the other cost associated with home ownership, and are feeling much better about leaving their apartments and Mom’s basement. This is having a very noticeable effect on stabilizing the market at the bottom.

Economy: The macro-economic environment remains dicey. I almost headed this section “Europe” as my third “E” but really it’s bigger than all that. The United Sates is no longer insulated from the rest of the world economically. I doubt that this was ever really true, but we felt it was true and we certainly acted as if it was true. The United States remains the world’s largest economy however it remains subject to outside shocks: Tsunami & nuclear disaster in Japan, economic slowdown in China and most dramatically European debit crisis – country by country bad news out of Europe send shocks through our financial system and impacts our banking sector. The largest of these in public perception is Europe which is unlikely to be resolved anytime soon and will continue to drag on the world economy. China seems to have better managed its financial affairs – easier in a totalitarian state – and seems likely to have a softer economic landing than Europe.

What’s the take away from all this? Housing is stabilizing now; sales volume is likely to increase significantly; good deals from a buyer’s perspective are likely to remain the norm for the next eight to twelve months; no real appreciation in real estate as an asset class is likely and value added efforts for renovations will remain high risk till after the end of 2012.

By Dick Thackston CRB, ABRM, ABR

Since the down turn started in the third quarter of 2005, (yes that’s right it’s actually been over six years if your benchmark is real estate brokerage), and the economic seizures started happening almost daily after November 2008, I’ve actually had some excellent experiences helping sellers and lenders work out a short sale.

Initially mortgage lenders were less likely to work out a short sale for a number of reasons: they didn’t believe the property was upside down, mortgage insurance would cover their losses if it went to foreclosure and/or they were simply too overwhelmed with the volume of business collapse that they couldn’t function efficiently and make decisions.

In 2007 I began the process of helping people work out a Short Sales on their homes if they were over mortgaged. One of the most successful short sales I’ve done was a house inKeene,New Hampshire. The owner had purchased the home about twenty years before he called me. He had tried selling the home himself and tried a Virtual Real Estate brokerage from outside the area with no local support. All the time he tried this, his home was sinking in value.

Why, one might wonder, if he had owned this home for over twenty years would he owe more than he paid? Well, actually what he had done was borrow money incrementally over the years to put his children through collage and purchase each of them cars when they graduated. He literally used his home as a savings account.

The biggest hurdle in the transaction was the owner, he just couldn’t believe that his home would be worth the loan balances plus and additional ten thousand dollars so that he could start his life over again someplace else. Once I was able to get him to understand that the value just wasn’t there, and he agreed to price the house to the market comparable prices in his neighborhood at the time, we got some OK sales traffic and ultimately an offer. I presented the offer to both the owner and his lender. I obtained the owners detailed financial information and the bank agreed to accept the short sale. Little or no emotion, very rational, and very efficient successful transaction.

The entire transaction from day of listing to day of closing the short sale, including negotiating with lender, was about five months or one hundred fifty days to closing.

By Dick Thackston CRB, ABRM, ABR

Short Sale Success Story:

Short sales have become a major part of my companys business.

In 2007 I realized that more and more of the owners I interviewed during listing appointments were helplessly under water on the loan on their home.

During the Savings & Loan crisis of the late 80s and early 90s I first experienced short sales. Back then, it was mostly small business owners who had second business loans against their home and as the economy slowed, their businesses slowed or failed, and the bank came after their houses. This is where I learned to do short sales. Up until then, personally, I had never even imagined not being able to sell a house and not clear the loan balances and I had been in the business over ten years at that point.

So I learned to negotiate with lenders to help them understand Fair Market Value and accept the reality of the situation – not the ideal for anyone, but half a loaf is better than none.

So when I started to see homeowners under water again four years ago I felt it would be important to start trying to negotiate short sales – again. Unfortunately both home owners and lenders were still stubbornly unrealistic about the situation at that time. Many of the homeowners I initially advised to consider a short sale ultimately lost the property singing the “I need, I own, I won’t” chorus regardless of market realities, or they spent valuable months and years following the market down. Needlessly doing needless damage to their credit by loosing their home to foreclosure, most had they followed my initial advice would have in fact walked away from a sales with some money, less than they had expected but some money – far better than a short sale or total loss through foreclosure.

Some of the short sales I initially proposed to banks wound up going to foreclosure as well. Costing the lender $50,000 to $100,000 in equity that could have preserved for their company, however banks had a problem too because many had just done refinances or made new loans they would say something like “we have an appraisal that is only six months old” not recognizing how quickly the market was changing in those days. What a tragedy! What a tragedy for all parties!

So now Short Sales are commonly accepted as better than foreclosure and few, if any, lenders are waiting for the market to recover. The biggest issue with Short Sales remains sellers that are too slow to take action. I got a call today from a seller that is schedule for foreclosure sale in ten days. He turned down a short sale about a year and a half ago and now he wants to try and find a buyer and complete a short sale negotiation in ten days? Not going to happen. I suggested that he simply needs to plan on the foreclosure and arrange to move out of the house. Banks at this point are far more realistic than sellers and far more prone to look realistically upon a short sale and work on it realistically. Bank of America and Citibank have made tremendous improvements in their systems for handling short sales. In both cases they have gotten to be the best in the business to deal with, when a few years ago I really don’t think they allocated any serious resources to the Short Sale process.

So we all waited over the weekend and until this morning to hear about what’s happening in the currency markets to the dollar and what Fed Chairman Bernanke would have to say at the FDIC; Fed sponsored conference on dealing with foreclosures. Here’s what we got, confirmation of no surprises.

The Fed has been talking about QE2, more quantitative easing – that is to say expanding the money supply, for several weeks. The traditional argument against QE2 is it devalues the dollar and transfers wealth from creditors to borrowers. The old saying “inflation is the debtors friend” remains as true today as it was at anytime in our past. Not surprisingly QE2 is not a popular concept with our trading partners and creditors specifically the Chinese. Mainly because it will make their products more expensive in the country and our products cheaper in their country as well as make their investments in mortgage backed securities less valuable. More importantly it would probably lead to higher oil prices and higher real estate prices.

Without higher real estate prices and the expectation of higher real estate prices the real estate market is likely to remain stagnant. Inflation, late 1970′s Jimmy Carter style, would change this leading to a reflation of real estate prices which would solve much of the problem with the current housing situation. Bernanke stated this morning that approximately 23% of Americans owe more on their homes they are worth: a true statement which does not lead to a stronger housing market.

So how does this tie into this morning’s comments? This morning’s comments were principally focused on curbing fraud and abuse in lending practices. Few people familiar with underwriting and lending practices between 2004 and 2007 with any depth of experience in the Housing Industry would not confirm that lending practices became increasingly irresponsible in that time period. Bernanke noted that home ownership peaked in 2004 at 69% however it is of no benefit to put people in homes that they cannot afford or that are over mortgaged. Literally trying to correct fraud and poor underwriting practices now would appear to be closing the barn door after the cows are out so why this speech now?

Because its part of the balance against the inflationary pressures that the Fed more than likely is about to release. In the inflation of prices that may well occur over the next several quarters the Fed and FDIC are saying effectively, “we will let prices rise but we will not allow irresponsible lending”. This move is designed to ensure the security of investor and attempt to restore confidence in the Mortgage Backed Securities which are critical to any housing recovery and positive future for American housing.

Bernanke is as much as saying trust us we won’t do this again, lend us some more money.

RE/MAX Predicts Increased Home Sales in Coming Months

By: Heather Hill Cernoch 10/20/2010

According to RE/MAX’s monthly National Housing Report, the housing market is attempting to return to traditional seasonal trends after a slow summer following the spring rush to qualify for the government’s homebuyer tax credit.

September sales were 6.4 percent below those in August and 20.6 percent below sales in September 2009.

RE/MAX also cites stabilization in prices due to a drop in the inventory of homes for sale.

“We anticipated the drop in home sales this summer due to the tax credit, and we usually see sales in September fall below August levels, but we’re encouraged by reports of signed contracts in the field,” said Margaret Kelly, CEO of the Denver-based RE/MAX, LLC.

“An increase in signed contract activity should translate into increased home sales in the coming months,” Kelly added.

RE/MAX attributes September’s 20 percent drop in sales from the previous year to homebuyers buying early to take advantage of the tax credit; sales in the spring were much higher than normal. Of the metro areas surveyed, only Miami reported higher September sales from a year ago with a 3.2 percent increase.

Despite the drop in transactions, September’s home prices were relatively stable with 33 metro areas showing a year-to-year increase in home sales prices. Overall, prices were down 2.7 percent from August but up 0.9 percent from a year ago. Prices are higher than 2009 in California cities and in the South and Midwest.

According to the report, the months’ supply of inventory, which indicates how long it would take to eliminate the current inventory of homes for sale at the current rate of sales, was 9.8, which is higher than the 9.1 supply reported in August and the 7.1 month supply in September 2009.

The RE/MAX National Housing Report is distributed each month and based on MLS data in approximately 54 metropolitan areas. It includes all residential property types and is not annualized. This month’s results are based on sales contracts signed in September.

New data according to TRULIA.com : Home inventory rises as prices continue to get slashed

“Seller’s are feeling the heat this summer as the economic recovery simmers down and home inventory levels climb,” says Pete Flint, co-founder and CEO of Trulia. In July’s price reduction report we discovered that 24 percent of US listings have experienced at least one price reduction. That’s a nine percent increase from the previous month. As more and more sellers reduce their home prices, the total dollar amount slashed has risen to $27.3 billion.”

 

Saul Klein, e-PRO Real Estate Educator San Diego, CA

Jul 08, 2010

International Interest in U.S. Homeownership Increases, Realtors Report

WASHINGTON (July 7, 2010) – International home buyers are increasingly
attracted to property in the U.S., according to the National Association
of Realtors’ 2010 Profile of International Home Buying Activity.
Several factors, including the strength of the dollar, the value and
desirability of U.S. real estate, and the emerging economic recovery,
continue to drive international interest in owning a home in this
country.

“While all real estate in the U.S. is local, the same is not true for
property owners,” said NAR President Vicki Cox Golder, owner of Vicki L.
Cox Real Estate in Tucson, Ariz. “The U.S. continues to be a top
destination for international buyers from all over the world. Foreign
buyers understand the value of owning a home in this country and can
rely on Realtors® to help guide them through the complex process of
buying property in the U.S. With expertise, knowledge and experience,
Realtors® have a global perspective.”

The survey, released today, covers the period between April 1, 2009, and
March 31, 2010. During that time foreign buyers, including those with
residency outside the U.S. as well as recent immigrants and temporary
visa holders, are estimated to have purchased $66 billion of U.S.
residential property, or 7 percent of the residential market.

Slightly more than a quarter of Realtors®, 28 percent, reported working
with at least one international client in the past year. This is a
significant increase from the 2009 report, when 23 percent of Realtors®
worked with foreign clients. Eighteen percent of all Realtors® were
estimated to have completed at least one sale, compared to 12 percent
last year.

“Several factors have contributed to an increase in international buyer
interest in the U.S.,” said Golder. “A large majority of Realtors®
report the changes in value to the U.S. dollar have had a strong impact
on the international real estate business. In addition, perceptions
abroad about trends in the U.S. real estate market have led many
international clients to believe purchasing a home in the U.S. is more
affordable than in their country and holds more value.”

International buyers came from 53 different countries around the world.
The top four countries were Canada, Mexico, the U.K. and China/Hong
Kong. With 23 percent of international buyers coming from Canada, the
country has remained the largest buying group in the past three years.
Foreign buyers from Mexico have been steadily increasing. In 2010 Mexico
replaced the U.K. as the second largest buying group with 10 percent of
buyers. Buyers from the U.K. decreased from 10.5 percent in 2009 to nine
percent in 2010. Eight percent of recent buyers came from China/Hong
Kong.

Two factors important to international clients when purchasing property
in the U.S. are proximity to their home country and the convenience of
air transportation. Florida typically attracts European, Canadian and
South American buyers while the East Coast draws Europeans. The West
Coast brings Asian buyers and the Southwest attracts Mexicans.

International buyers were reported in 39 states in 2010, but a slight
majority of the total buyers are concentrated in Florida, California,
Arizona and Texas. These four states account for 53 percent of purchases
and have remained the top destinations for the past three years, with
Florida and California remaining the top two destinations.

The median price paid by international buyers for a home in the U.S. was
$219,400, a decrease from 2009′s median price of $247,100. However, the
median price paid by foreign buyers was significantly higher than the
overall median market price, which was $172,500 in 2009. On average,
foreign buyers tend to purchase closer to the upper end of the market;
16 percent of the total international purchases were for homes priced at
more than $500,000. According to Realtors®, this was because
international buyers are typically looking for a second home.

A majority of international buyers, 66 percent, purchased single-family
detached homes. However, more international buyers purchased a condo
than did their U.S. counterparts, at 23 percent and 7 percent,
respectively. Only 44 percent of international buyers used a mortgage to
pay for their home, compared to 92 percent of domestic buyers.
Fifty-five percent of foreign buyers paid all cash. Realtors® reported
that a majority of international buyers use all cash because of the
difficulty in establishing international credit in the U.S. Over
one-third, 34 percent, of potential foreign buyers was unable to
complete transactions because of financing problems in the U.S.

The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is
America’s largest trade association, representing 1.1 million members
involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate
industries.

….
Information about NAR is available at www.realtor.org. News releases are
posted in the Web site’s “News Media” section in the NAR Media
Center.

Here’s a handy chart to help you out.

NAR Issue Brief

Homebuyer Tax Credit Changes

National Association of REALTORS® Government Affairs Division

500 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Washington DC, 20001

FEATURE Jan 1 – November 30, 2009Rules as enacted February 2009 December 1 – April 30,2010 Rules as enacted

November 2009

First timeBuyer –

Amount of Credit

$8000($4000 married

filing separate)

$8000($4000 married

filing separate)

First time Buyer – Definition for Eligibility May not have had an interest in a principal residence for 3 years prior to purchase Same
Current Homeowner – Amount of Credit No Provision $6500($3250 married

filing separate)

Effective Date – Current Owner No Provision Date of Enactment
Current Homeowner –Definition for Eligibility No Provision Must have used the home sold or being sold as a principal residence consecutively for 5 of the previous 8 years
Termination of Credit Purchases after November 30, 2009. (Becomes April 30, 2010 on Date of Enactment.) Purchases after April 30, 2010
Binding Contract Rule None So long as a written binding contract to purchase is in effect on April 30, 2010, the purchaser will have until July 1, 2010 to close.
Income Limits (Note: Increased income limits are effective as of date of enactment of bill) $75,000 – single$150,000 – married

Additional $20,000 phase out

$125,000 – single$225,000 – married

Additional $20,000 phase

out

Limitation on Cost of Purchased Home None $800,000Effective Date of Enactment
Purchase by a Dependent No Provision IneligibleEffective Date of Enactment
Antifraud Rule None Purchaser must attach documentation of purchase to tax return

 This chart is just another way Dick Thackston and the REALTORS at R.H. Thackston & Company REALTORS can help you. Dick works with the other 34 New Hampshire, Vermont & Massachusetts agents in his 3 offices helping buyers find and close on homes. To see all the homes on the market today in New Hampshire, Vermont & Massachusetts visit www.dickthackston.com or give him a call today at 603.283.0622.